It’s looking like Phaedra Parks will have to answer to a judge over alleged criminal activity by the southern bell back in 2012.
If you remember, Angela Stanton spilled all the tea on Phaedra Parks during an interview with VIBE Magazine. Staton aired all of Parks dirty laundry coming strait out and saying that Parks is a criminal just like her husband Apollo Nida and now Phaedra Parks will have to sit through a deposition to prove otherwise.
CelebNMusic247.com has learned some more details on her alleged criminal enterprise via Radar Online who says Phaedra Parks can run from the law, but she can’t hide!
After months of dodging requests to take a deposition in her ongoing defamation lawsuit, Radar Online.com has
learned that the Real Housewives of Atlanta star has been slapped with a court order stipulating that she must sit for the interview within 45 days — or face the wrath of a judge!
Parks sued former friend Angela Stanton in 2012 over claims Stanton made in her e-book, Lies of a Real Housewife. As Radar has reported, Stanton alleged Parks oversaw a
“criminal enterprise” that included auto title fraud and more. Two years later, Stanton’s attorneys are still trying to get Parks to sit for a deposition and divulge just what she knows. According to court records, they “began asking for available dates to take Parks’ deposition” back on November 15, 2013. From that date forward, they tried to “work with Parks, by and through her counsel, on numerous occasions to schedule her deposition, but [have] met with nothing but excuses, refusals and empty promises…”
All told, the attorneys claimed Parks has shown a “refusal to participate in good faith in the discovery process.”
Now, Radar has learned, a judge agreed that Parks’ deposition is a “necessary step” in the case, issuing an order on June 19 for Parks to set a date for a deposition by July 4, and to sit for the deposition by August 3.
What could she discuss?
Stanton claimed in her book that “there was criminal activity involved in our relationship” as she and Parks became business associates in a scheme involving “fraudulent bank accounts, insurance checks, fake IDs, chop shops, stolen cars, fraudulent titles, fraudulent registration cards.”
Parks has never been charged, questioned, or named in connection with such schemes by the authorities, and insists all of Stanton’s claims are the libelous rantings of a bitter woman.
Thoughts?
